Sunday, December 11, 2005

Posts: This Post

This is the 101st post to this site. It is a short post and is pretty much self-referential with little to no basis or content outside of its own nature.

Recommend: Not really. Kind of shallow, maybe a bit flat. Really, you should skip this post and save the time it takes to formulate the letters contained therein into coherent meaning if you haven't made it this far already.

6 comments:

Andrew said...

101 is a prime number.
it's also a palindrome.
it's also 1+(1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+9+8+7+6+5+4+3+2+1).
it's also the sum of the prime numbers from 1 to 23.
also, it's the sum of 1+100, and 2+99, and 3+98, etc., so if you multiply it by 50 you get 5050, which is like adding up all the numbers from 1 to 100.
also, it's 1^2 plus 6^2 plus 8^2 or 1^2 plus 10^2. or 10^2 plus 1^anything, etc.
it's also binary for 5.
also, if you divide 5050 by 2, which is what you get if you add 1+0+1, you get 2525, which is the year in that dumb Zager and Evans song from the 60's.
also, it's a number of dalmations in a cartoon movie.
that's all i can think of right now.

Andrew Najberg said...

wow. That's gonna occupy my mind for the rest of the evening. That's way better than I had.
:claps:

Andrew Najberg said...

Actually, to add to the list, it is also the number of things one can do with a dead cat as suggestion within the book "One hundred and one uses for a dead cat" - in fact, I think it is a standard number used to denote a large number of possible uses for a number of different items, as well as ways of cooking things. Hmm.

Andrew said...

i kind of felt that one, toward the end, but couldn't put it into the right words...
'also is a standard number used to denote a large number of possible uses for a number of different items, as well as ways of cooking things'.

Murf said...

Post Comments : Andrew H.'s First Comment To This Post

"Brilliant! Informative! Over-the-top-Performance! Must-Read-Comment of the Year! Bravo, Andrew!"

And to the rest of us (well, Andrew H included!): congratulations on keeping up with the reviewing! Wikipedia watch out, for we are catching up!

Andrew Najberg said...

Actually, I here Wikipedia is in a bit of trouble right now due to numerous innacuracies. We don't have inaccuracies, only inanity, so we're one up on them. Bite it Wikipedia!